Thinking about nonsense I was wondering how does nonsense come to be.

You see, one does not willingly produce nonsense, since nobody really wants to produce nonsense at all. There is not any real reason for anyone in his full senses to produce nonsense with any purpose at all, but then how does nonsense get created? There is after all quite a big amount of nonsense out there but then again most of it has been considered actually clever... at least by its author. Is nonsense just a perception? That which people call nonsense is after all somebody else hard work. Is there something involved in the creative process during the creation of nonsense that just simply goes wrong or is it something that randomly hits people?

Maybe there's a god out there striking people with the creativity for nonsense.

The god of Nonsense, pointing his finger with the all mighty power of nonsense, striking unaware people to be the sole producers of nonsense.

Maybe its just some sort of creative block. Like when writers encounter writers block and suddenly start trying to grasp for whatever sense of creativity they can without realizing that it might just as well be creative nonsense.

What if there is a pattern for the creation of nonsense. I bet there is no possible way to produce nonsense willingly because it tends to just turn out as gibberish instead of nonsense; although maybe gibberish is also nonsense. Considering gibberish is in fact not nonsense but just complete randomness then the actual creation of nonsense is not something one can achieve very easily. But if there was a pattern for the creation of nonsense then there would be a way to predict when somebody is about to produce nonsense ridding him of the shame before it even happens.

Think of the repercussions this discovery would have on the world. Lets say for instance that whenever the idiot who invented the artificial strawberry flavor was about to invent it and foolishly declare it strawberry flavor, by predicting when nonsense might occur we could have then prevented such an idiotic task and saved the world from the incoherence we now live in. This finding might just make the world a better place, hell we could even have prevented the destruction of Iraq.

The problem about studying nonsense is that it appears to be random and therefore is very difficult to actually perceive, specially during the creation process. One can only know something is nonsense once its created but during the creation process we cant really know because we don't really know the outcome yet.

What we could do is, lock hundreds of artists in a building and have cameras watch them all the time. I'm sure some of them will be able to produce interesting things, we can throw that away and just keep the nonsense and try and study the creation process through the cameras. If we try and record each and every individual in the building we can go back to the creation process after we know in fact that the outcome is plain nonsense. It cant be that difficult since art, real art is difficult to come about, so in theory out of 100 random aspiring artists most of them will produce nonsense.... wait that's also called contemporary art. Hmmm so much of the artist idea.

There might be a scientific procedure to create nonsense, assuming of course it can be created. Maybe its not even created at all, maybe its transmuted, kind of like gold from lead. That's it we can try and use the same procedure to make gold from lead  to make nonsense. But first we have to figure out what element might make nonsense? We can just try and shoot ions at everything we see. That sounds like fun, we can try and design a portable ion gun and shoot random people and random things until we find the raw material for making nonsense. I wonder if nonsense has ions. The ion gun will definitely not work if it doesn't.

Being that nonsense is the opposite of sense, defining sense as thoughts and ideas that are coherent then both being thoughts would be some sort of energy. I don't think it has ions then, maybe it has photons.

Maybe its closer to anti matter. If we use the same process for the creation of anti matter except instead of applying it to matter try and applying it to thought, wait, how the hell does one make antimatter? according to wikipedia having an anti proton pass near an atom at relativistic speeds would force an an electron positron pair and if the anti proton combines with the positron it will then form anti hydrogen but how the hell do they get to make an anti proton? Well assuming we could make... wait what would make up nonsense? stupidity I guess. There we have it, we could lock up a bunch of people in a room and blast them with stupidity, that's going to make lots of nonsense for sure. That actually sounds similar to the ion gun, I wonder what sort of nonsense would come out of shooting people with an ion gun? Maybe we can even get golden nonsense or just golden  thoughts, no that's not what we want. Back to the stupidity gun, wait how the hell are we going to blast them with stupidity? Now that's a hard one. I guess its easier to find people that are already stupid rather than try to create an idiot from a perfectly sensible person.

The search for stupidity.
Now where on earth would we find a conglomerate of people with fair chance of finding at least one idiot? Lets try Texas, that's where Bush came from... fuck it lets just kidnap Bush. Wait we don't even have to kidnap him, the sole purpose for kidnapping Bush would be to study his behavior which we can already do watching him on TV.

I will now proceed to investigate about the creative process of nonsense by studying the behavioral patterns of George Bush.

Ill post my results as soon as I find any...